Creativity

Can technology use affect our creative abilities?

There is a common misconception, that stems from research conducted on split-brain patients in the 1960s, suggesting that creativity and analytical thinking are confined to either the right- or left-hemispheres of the brain. This has led to expressions about people being either creative or analytical, implying a dominance of one side of the brain over the others.

Creativity research conducted since the 1980s has challenged this binary perspective, yet the outdated myth is still entrenched as a worldview and perpetuates narratives around how we work. It also fosters a subconscious bias towards the creative potential of both ourselves and others. 

 

Research on freestyle wrappers highlights that both analytical and creative regions could be found on the right and left sides of the brain. FMRI scans conducted during the study indicated that creative regions can only be activated when the brain temporarily attenuates (switches-off or rests) the analytical processing functions. 

A creative idea as defined by Alice Flaherty is “one that is both novel and useful (or influential) in a particular social setting”. In this research she focusses on the creative drive, rather than skill, an important shift from the dominant narratives towards recognising that creativity is an inherent trait in us all. She notes that individuals who experience writer’s block can become frustrated and depressed by the problem, further exacerbating the issue. Alternatively, they can overcome the mental rut by taking a break and allowing themselves to be distracted. 

It seems, therefore, that when our brain is engaged in wrestling with a problem to solve, it is impossible to see things from a new perspective, or develop creative ideas, or make lateral thinking connections. Whereas taking a break allows the brain freedom to make unique, creative connections.

You may have noticed that your most creative ideas come to you when you are in the shower, on a walk and when not entrenched in cognitively demanding activities. But how many of us avoid boredom at all costs. In any break we have from work, or physical social connection, or in any moment spent alone, our attention is more often than not focused on a screen. 

 

Spending time online or staring at a screen, can limit time spent engaging in free association. Our ‘thinking’ brains have limited chance to disconnect, and to switch on the ‘creative’ brain, denying us of potential novel, creative thinking. This may lead to lower levels of creative time and possibly a reduced sense of creative ability. 


It may be time for us to consider that using our technology to distract us from a hard or cognitively demanding task is denying us creative and lateral thinking experiences. The less creative we think we are, the lower the chances are that we will give ourselves the freedom to recognise that we are by nature creative beings. 


Our challenge, therefore, is to actively allow ourselves strategic periods of time away from our screens and constant distractions, and proactively rediscover our inherent creative flair.

 

Links to a few other articles and podcasts on being creative are available below:  

Related Articles
Divergent Mind Article Header

Divergent Mind – Jenara Nerenberg

Humans tend to categorise and group others according to specific physical, behavioural and mental states or characteristics.

We do this because we need shortcuts to minimise excessive energy consumption. Getting to know someone on an individual basis takes time, effort and energy. So, if we can quickly classify someone, we can group them according to our biases and constructed categories, so we can quickly either reject, accept, embrace or alienate others.

‘Judging a book by its cover’ is part of this natural default.

So, categorising and pathologising a certain type of behaviour and psychological or neurological condition is a quick way to understand and behave towards another. 

But, even boxes have nuances and not all boxes are created equal.

Culturally, we have expressed and embraced certain historical biases and narratives of people, mostly based on medical/psychological categories based on ‘common’ symptoms that align with the diagnostic criteria and descriptions.

The current mental health criteria (especially according to the Diagnostic Statistical Manual – DSM) used can be really helpful for some to identify the cause or reason for their way of thinking, their behaviour or the way their mind or emotions work.

But, it can also be a label that is used to judge both others and self

This label can also be used as an excuse for a specific behavioural pattern, to either justify or defend against unhealthy ways of being. 

This book helps to unpick some of these cultural and self-limiting biases. Looking at the historical and contemporary perspective of neuro-divergent ways of thinking and being can create a new narrative and thinking pattern to empower individuals to embrace and treasure their abilities as valuable assets or even super-powers.

If you fall into the category of ‘neuro-divergent’, Jenara Nerenberg helps to explain different forms of neuro-divergence that can co-exist or present in different ways for different individuals.

Working through the book can help you understand more about how and why you think, act and respond to what you do.

This book can help both those with neuro-divergent abilities and those who love and care for them, to be more understanding, forgiving and adaptive to specific needs – in a way that can enhance, empower and maximise a life well lived. 

This video (which will take you through to YouTube) is an introduction to the first Neurodiversity Project conference.  

Search on YouTube for other videos and interviews that Jenara has conducted on neuro-diversity

About Jenara Nerenberg

Jenara is the founder of The Nerovidersity Project

As a renowned journalist and author who discovered that she was neuro-divergent as an adult. This book is an extension of the research and interviews that she has conducted in her search for her own answers. 

Book Review Related Articles
Creative Thinking

How can individual or group creativity and collaboration be enhanced by hybrid working?

Our individualistic personalities and characters means we have our very own best-practice in being productive and creative.

In his short article titled ‘no, you don’t have to meet in person‘, Adam Grant showcases that even though Zoom session can limit group creativity and divergent thinking, in-person creativity sessions can reduce the number of great ideas that may otherwise come from time spent thinking alone. 

My favourite quote from the article is: ‘The best of both worlds is intermittent collaboration: alternating between individual idea generation and group idea evaluation. The most creative virtual teams aren’t in touch every hour or even every day. They divide and conquer on deep work and then come together for periods of burstiness, with messages flying back and forth’.

Related Articles